<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landing Page Load Time Impact on Google AdWords Quality Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semseoexpert.com/search-engine-marketing-consultant/landing-page-load-time-impact-on-google-adwords-quality-score/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semseoexpert.com/search-engine-marketing-consultant/landing-page-load-time-impact-on-google-adwords-quality-score</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing &#38; Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://www.semseoexpert.com/search-engine-marketing-consultant/landing-page-load-time-impact-on-google-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semseoexpert.com/uncategorized/landing-page-load-time-impact-on-google-adwords-quality-score#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I think in any case the next thing is optimizing pages, so they can be easily and quickly viewed on the cell phones.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So making your page load faster would make sense anyway even if Google didn&#039;t incorporate it in their rank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in any case the next thing is optimizing pages, so they can be easily and quickly viewed on the cell phones.</p>
<p>So making your page load faster would make sense anyway even if Google didn&#8217;t incorporate it in their rank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

